Monday, June 28, 2010

Guns n' Poseurs

In a case brought by a DC gun owner, the Supreme Court predictably splits 5-4 in a victory for gun nuts like me.  The court also revisited a similar restrictive Chicago city law. 

Related:  NYT:  'Supreme Court Rules Gun Rights Apply To Local Gun Laws.'

So don't mess with me and my Taurus .38 resting comfortably in the console of my Mercedes Benz . . .
at 2:01 PM
Labels: , ,

11 comments:

  1. The Supreme Court made my day.

    ReplyDelete

  2. I'm a little worried about this. When fed laws are less restrictive than local laws, this works in gun owners' favor, but what if, for instance, the "assault weapons" ban is reinstated? Then what? To me this is a dangerous "all or nothing" proposition, although I guess I don't have a good alternative. Well I have one, but I don't think it'll really fly these days.

    If Jim Bohannon reads this: Your name sounds so familiar. Weren't you on the air in Cleveland at one time?

    ReplyDelete

  3. favorite gun related bumber sticker. "Why do I carry a gun? Because a policeman is to heavy"

    ReplyDelete

  5. Marty,
    Careful driving that loaded Benz across juresdictional lines!
    Joe,
    I'm still on in Cleveland, WNIR-FM-100.1, weeknights 11PM-3AM, or at www.jimbotalk.net, 10PM-1AM

    ReplyDelete

  6. Do remind me never to a ask you for a ride. Just kdding. Keep packing the heat baby!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Beresford TiptonJune 28, 2010 9:09 PM

    Note to Al Gore:  Do not press Marty for a massage.

    ReplyDelete

  8. I'm an EXCELLENT masseuse!  Ask my cousin Art Cole about my fab foot massages?

    ReplyDelete

  9. Curious why you went with the Taurus.  For an extra $60 you could have stepped up to the Ruger .38.

    ReplyDelete

  10. I didn't know, RM...

    ReplyDelete

  11. I didn't know, RM...

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)