who the hell would want to look at Hill's cleavage. and she has hairy legs underneath those ugly pantsuits too. somebody do an intervention and get her on "What not to Wear."
Methinks it was Hillary's baggage, not cleavage, that did her in. And what a s-t-r-e-t-c-h to compare a 25 year old Cosmo layout of a very sexy young man to the artificially supported and exposed aging breast of someone who never was sexy. This would be a valid comparison only is Marty/aka Chickaboomer was the subject. Sexy then and sexy now...
who the hell would want to look at Hill's cleavage. and she has hairy legs underneath those ugly pantsuits too. somebody do an intervention and get her on "What not to Wear."
ReplyDeleteMethinks it was Hillary's baggage, not cleavage, that did her in.
ReplyDeleteAnd what a s-t-r-e-t-c-h to compare a 25 year old Cosmo layout of a very sexy young man to the artificially supported and exposed aging breast of someone who never was sexy. This would be a valid comparison only is Marty/aka Chickaboomer was the subject.
Sexy then and sexy now...
Oops.."is" should read "if"
ReplyDeleteIn Hillary's case, photo spread would be an unfortunate choice of words.
ReplyDeleteHillary would have trouble getting a full page spread in Home and Garden.
ReplyDeleteDouble standard???? Not much difference from Dems comments about minorities being more tolerated.
Hillary's cleavage? No wonder the Dems are delusional. There's more breast meat in a box of McNuggets.
ReplyDeleteVinney
At least the headline was "Cleavage Controversy" and not "Leave It To Beaver".
ReplyDelete