Sunday, November 1, 2009

The Quick and the Wed



The NYT mag's fawning cover piece on Barack and Michelle Obama's marriage.

20 comments:

  1. Over the next years - I am sure a Monica will appear, then what will the grey lady say?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wonder how much it costs the American taxpayors to pay for the PR person who came up with the marketing of marriage idea?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I hope the next thing they market is abstinence.

    ReplyDelete
  4. A Black Camelot - well kiss my grits.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Hucksters, not the Huxtables.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Give me Lucy and Ricky anytime.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I remember back at the Clinton years, the first several months in office -didn't the newspapers proclaim that they had the perfect marriage?

    ReplyDelete
  8. In the white house - it is Halloween everyday. Even the WH media get to dress up as journalists.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I guess the grey lady thinks that a democrat that is married is news.

    ReplyDelete
  10. NY Times opines how hard it is for Michelle with all the time she is separated from the Prez. What about all those poor wives working and husbands with 2 jobs working to keep there kids in clothes.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hey - the Times never once mentioned the mother in law living full time in the WH.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hey - this is not the first time the NYT made a big deal over a presidential marriage. Didn't they do a great job when Hilary wrote the book on her marriage - It takes a village?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Now if they wanted to cover a real presidential marriage they should have covered Nancy and Ronnie.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Did they photoshop the teleprompter out of that picture?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Bill and Hilary - the perfect storm
    Michelle and Barack - the perfect wedding

    ReplyDelete
  16. POTUS went on to say - hey honey, have you seen my glasses lying around?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hey Baby - you want to go upstairs and shoot some hoops?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Now if they wanted to cover a real presidential marriage they should have covered Nancy and Ronnie.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Hey - this is not the first time the NYT made a big deal over a presidential marriage. Didn't they do a great job when Hilary wrote the book on her marriage - It takes a village?

    ReplyDelete