Permit me to assume my role as an adult professional and veteran broadcast journalist. Olbermann reportedly threatened to quit. The aforementioned should've let him walk like he's done in the past.
Who's the boss? The management authority chain at MSNBC is topped with prez Phil Griffin. The chain continues to NBC and Steve Capus and Jeff Zucker. Then it's on to parent company GE and chair Jeff Immelt.
Who's the employee? Keith Olbermann, broadcast journalist, host, commentator.
What's the issue? Keith Olbermann refuses to cease personal attacks on rival time slot hot Bill O'Reilly and O'Reilly's number one-rated cable news network FOX, embarrassing GE's chair Jeff Immelt who thought he had a secret deal with FOX's Roger Ailes to end the Olbermann-instigated on-air war. Olbermann insists there was "no deal."
Why was Immelt involved? FOX's O'Reilly finally had it up to his keister with years of Olbermann attacks and rather than attacking the messenger, O'Reilly went after Immelt and GE.
Why is Olbermann still on the air with apparent impunity? Jeff Immelt has lost face big time over Olbermann's refusal to adhere to the terms of the Immelt/Ailes cease-fire. Immelt is the biggest loser in this public relations nightmare. The GE chair put his reputation on the line when he agreed to reign in a proven loose cannon with a long track record of TV network implosion. Is Olbermann that valuable? His Howard Beale novelty has worn off as witnessed by "Countdown's" declining ratings.NBC is apparently buying Olbermann and his faithful followers' spin that NBC is buckling to Big Corporation censorship. Fatuous. Television networks were corporate tools from inception. Olbermann's fantasized alter-ego Edward R. Murrow sealed his fate by going public with how CBS and chairman William Paley put corporate interests and advertisers ahead of news. Murrow circulated copies to CBS brass of his swan song he was planning to deliver to the 1958 RTNDA convention in Chicago critical of the bottom line usurping news.
The Olbermann case has nothing to do with news censorship. Rather, the issue is childish, vengeful, defamatory on-air behavior that has finally touched parent company GE and chairman Jeffrey Immelt. What Olbermann is engaging in is not news but personal attacks on rivals. To argue censorship is patently absurd. Olbermann's ratings skyrocketed when he began attacking O'Reilly and Fox. NBC's Jeff Zucker - mindful that ratings equal ad dollars - permitted Olbermann to continue a year after Olbermann's on-air behavior was first broached as a serious issue.
I would advise FOX News and Bill O'Reilly to stop stooping to Olbermann's level. O'Reilly blows Olbermann away in the ratings. Olbermann's appeal is fading. Why legitimize him as a worthy opponent?
Howard Kurtz Wash Posr media maven: It was never intended to be a cease-fire. The best that the men who run two of the nation's media giants were hoping to achieve was a ratcheting down of the rhetoric between their warring commentators.
But Keith Olbermann refused to play along this week, Bill O'Reilly returned fire, and the New York Times got wounded in the crossfire.
The peace talks with Fox sparked a fierce battle within MSNBC, where a faction led by Olbermann argued that the network's journalistic integrity was at stake -- and that any leak of a nonaggression pact with Fox could damage NBC's reputation for independence.
Things had looked very different in April. When Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes left the private dining room of Jeffrey Immelt, the General Electric chief executive whose company includes NBC, at 30 Rockefeller Plaza, they thought they had a firm deal. But as in any high school grudge match, neither brawler wanted to back down.
For viewers, the constant attacks have been a grand spectator sport, but their bruising nature has at times been painful to watch. Olbermann started the assault on "Bill-O" five years ago as a way of boosting his fortunes against "The O'Reilly Factor," which roughly triples his ratings; O'Reilly refuses to mention the "Countdown" host by name, instead training his ammo on MSNBC, NBC and Immelt.
The Washington Post reported last year that a series of back-channel discussions involving Ailes, Immelt, Fox owner Rupert Murdoch and NBC chief executive Jeff Zucker failed to halt the sniping. Last spring, according to executives familiar with the matter who declined to be identified discussing private meetings, the brass tried again at 30 Rock. A GE executive called a senior Fox official, and a secret lunch was arranged. A Fox representative confirmed the meeting.
After using a side entrance to Immelt's 53rd-floor dining room -- their Manhattan buildings are a block apart -- Ailes offered a blunt, if slightly jocular, diagnosis of the problem. He could control his nutcases, Ailes said, but Immelt couldn't control his.
Immelt and Ailes agreed to talk to their troops about lowering the temperature. In May, during a private Microsoft conference in Redmond, Wash., Immelt and Murdoch confirmed the understanding. If either host or network was in the news, that would be fair comment, but the personal stuff had to stop.
On June 1, after the slaying of George Tiller, Olbermann savaged O'Reilly. Noting that O'Reilly had repeatedly attacked the abortion doctor with such broadsides as "Tiller has blood on his hands," Olbermann suggested that O'Reilly contributed to the climate surrounding the fatal shooting. Olbermann announced that things had gotten so serious he would no longer use an O'Reilly caricature and Ted Baxter voice in mocking him. "The goal here," he said, "is to get this blindly irresponsible man and his ilk off the air."
The next night, O'Reilly retaliated. He said MSNBC was spewing "hate," declaring: "Immelt is using his news operation to promote the Obama administration and liberal activities, while seeking billion-dollar government contracts from the president." O'Reilly said his program was looking into whether GE was doing "deadly business" with Iran. He gave out Immelt's e-mail address.
Immelt called Ailes the next morning, saying O'Reilly had gone way too far. Ailes was sympathetic and again said they should take a stand against personal and gratuitous attacks. The war, Ailes said, is over.
But the war was just beginning at MSNBC, where an opinionated culture is often at odds with NBC News. The day after Olbermann's comments about the Tiller slaying, executives convened a large meeting and talked about Fox and the importance of striking the right on-air tone. Olbermann later expressed a willingness to make minor adjustments in his style, but he and his allies, concerned about setting a precedent, dug in for a fight. Olbermann left Zucker and executives with the impression that he might quit if the dispute wasn't resolved to his satisfaction.
Things mostly quieted down. Several MSNBC commentators ripped Fox host Glenn Beck late last month for calling President Obama a racist, but both sides felt such criticism was within bounds.
Last Saturday, the Times carried a front-page story with the headline, "Voices From Above Silence a Cable TV Feud." It said that executives on both sides had "arranged a cease-fire" between Olbermann and O'Reilly -- which officials at both networks say overstated the case. In a seemingly contradictory passage, Olbermann was quoted as saying, "I am party to no deal."
But with a GE spokesman quoted as saying the corporation was "happy" about the new "level of civility," Olbermann and others felt they could not live with the appearance of buckling under, executives say. Forty-eight hours later, Olbermann made a journalistic declaration of independence -- from his own company -- with a blistering "Worst Persons in the World" segment.
He gave the bronze award to the author of the Times piece, saying Brian Stelter had asked him "at least twice last week if there was such a deal, and I told him, on and off the record, there was not." He gave the runner-up award to "Bill-O the clown," rehashing a controversy about remarks that O'Reilly made when he dined at a Harlem restaurant in 2007. And the winner was Murdoch, who, Olbermann said, citing the same Times story, had "muzzled Bill-O, kept him from speaking his mind."
Fox felt the agreement had been shattered. "This is more of an internal issue that NBC and GE need to work through," a Fox spokesman said. Fox executives disputed the contention of some NBC officials that any understanding was amorphous. "There was an agreement for no personal attacks," one said. GE and NBC declined to comment.
By Wednesday, a breaking news story gave O'Reilly an opening. He went after Immelt, noting that GE had paid $50 million to settle Securities and Exchange Commission charges that the company had misled investors. O'Reilly said that "NBC News, owned by GE, has been perhaps Barack Obama's biggest supporter in the media. And Jeff Immelt was rewarded for that when President Obama appointed him to his economic advisory board."

Marty, your interview on Jim Bohannon show. You stated you couldn't remember what Keith Olbermann said on MSNBC to have the crowd at the RNC convention turn against NBC News.
ReplyDeleteI think it has to do with the September 11th tribute which Keith Olbermann apologized for his network for airing the video which he thinks was propaganda video and the other was he threaten to quit if NBC didn't beef of security because he was afraid of being assassinated by someone from the RNC...
I forgot one thing. He said Sen. John McCain has done worse with 9/11 and the evil behind it by airing the the tribute video and of course accusing him that he's blackmailing a portion of voters to vote for him.
ReplyDeleteHow low the Morale must be at NBC and MSNBC. They don't look happy, they don't say anything that isn't nasty and negative, (They Should have their "Americans are Racist" who don't agree with the lunatic fringe rant set to a jingle). Why do they think people aren't watching? I don't want to listen to them bickering about partisan politics "That isn't News"
ReplyDeleteWhat's the add? The place for Politics? I don't recognize mudslinging and smearing as legitimate political discussion, apparently their ratings prove my point. Trolls might enjoy this type of programing are Trolls undeserved demographic? Do they have lots of disposable income to buy the network's sponsors products?
Marty, Who is in charge of producing this commentary? I mean there is the problem NOT KO. The one feeding words into his mouth :) Find the Producer, and set whoever it is up on a date eharmony -match dot com, maybe if that person get's laid, the commentary will lighten up LMAO.
See, I've got this little voice inside my head saying don't look back-you can never look back and the smart money is on Olbermann continuing his angst for the same reason Mr. O'Reilly accuses those with whom he disagrees or those who are A-List with being afraid to come on his show.
ReplyDeleteBottom Line--it's all air. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain(s).
It's gotta end, Pat. This has spun out of control on all fronts...
ReplyDeleteShoot the Ozes...
It doesn't matter now whether KO plays nice or not. So many viewers have been turned off by KO's insanity. Countdown is toast.
ReplyDeleteWhy can't they just get rid of Olbermann? Am I missing something here? If he is a liability to the company, is this what lawyers are for - cut your losses and try to regroup.
ReplyDeleteWill MSNBC/NBC be able to save face, or do they even care anymore?
KO is a warm breathing body. Look what else they have on the air. They might as well go infomercial 24/7. He sucks air fro one LONG hour and until someone at MSNBC has the balls to get off their ass and find someone else, KO will continue drooling at the mouth. Hey bring the naked chcik fro ESPN. At least she would be eye candy.
ReplyDeleteA key factor here: Shock value. That's the value(?) of such behavior, and it's worn off. What do they do now? Stalk each other shows? homes? children?
ReplyDelete